Personality is the combination of characteristics or qualities that form an individual’s distinctive character.The term "personality trait" refers to enduring personal characteristics that are revealed in a particular pattern of behaviour in a variety of situations. The nature of personality traits can be seen as individual predilections to show constant arrays of opinions, frame of mind, and activities. Simple tendencies are highly analytical over time, exert impact on actions, and can be used to predict future behaviour. Personality has to do with individual differences among people in behaviour patterns, cognition and emotion.
The study of personality started by the Greek physician Hippocrates. He developed Temperament theory into medical theory which has roots in the ancient four humours theory (460- 370 BC).He believed that personality is made of body fluids (humours): Blood, Yellow Bile, Black Bile and Phlegm. The explanation was further developed by his successor Galen during the second century CE. Many Researchers greatly shaped our modern theories of temperament. Hans Eysenck (1916–1997) was one of the first psychologists to analyze personality differences using a psycho-statistical method (factor analysis), and his research led him to believe that temperament is biologically based and consists of Extroversion, Psychoticism, Neuroticism personality component. Gordon Allport was an early pioneer in the study of traits. In 1990, J.M. Digman advanced five-factor model of personality, which was extended by Lewis Goldberg. They consider personality is broken into components called the Big Five, which are openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (or emotionality). According to Eysenck, these components are generally stable over time, and about half of the variance appears to be attributable to a person's genetics rather than the effects of one's environment.
Different personality characteristics of people may affect the oral health. Although collective impact of social, behavioural, cultural, lifestyle, educational and economic factors have also been concerned in determining the influence of personality characteristics on oral health status. It is considered that the age, gender, smoking habits, anxiety, stress, depression in everyday life, self-liking was positively related to the oral health behaviour. Thomson et al suggested that personality may be related to the oral health as it increases the risk of oral disease and alters the individuals’ attitude towards the disease.
In the field of dentistry, several studies have demonstrated a relationship between Quality of Life and patient personality. Van Waas et al. described a relationship between patient satisfaction and psychological factors in wearers of complete dentures. Kressin et al. concluded that negative affectivity, which is a general disposition to experience subjective distress, was significantly associated with Oral Hygiene Related Quality Of Life ratings in a study of older men. Another study found that different personality component may influence dental perceptions and play a significant role in shaping satisfaction with dentition in younger people.
Brief cognitive interventions can alter the attitudes and values tapped into by personality traits, which might be useful in preventive dentistry. The number of environmental, physical and psychological factors has the potential to alter the gingival tissues and host immune responses resulting in more severe periodontal disease expression. Also, there is the impact of overall personality of an individual on person’s oral hygiene condition. Hence, the present study was done to assess the impact of this personality trait on oral hygiene performance and gingival health.
Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the institutional ethical committee Swargiya Dadasaheb Kalmegh Smruti Dental College and Hospital, Nagpur India. Total 620 outpatients visiting to the Department of Periodontology from January 2016 to March 2016 were invited to participate in the present study. The inclusion criteria were 1) Minimum age of 18 years of both the genders 2) Minimum 20 permanent teeth.(with at least index teeth for indices) 3) subjects who are not under the professionally monitored plaque control program. The exclusion criteria were subjects having any 1) systemic illness Patients with a history of a systemic condition or medication use that might influence the gingival condition were excluded (i.e. patients with a history of diabetes mellitus, thyroid diseases, chronic renal problems 2) subjects under steroids, NSAIDS, antibiotics etc.3) Pregnancy 4) Subjects who have not answered the complete questionnaire 5) Mentally retarded subjects.
A total of 1200 subjects visited to the Periodontology Department OPD during the study period. Of these, 900 subjects met the inclusion criteria 620 subjects were agreed to participate in the study. (The Sample size of 620 subjects was obtained by the formula n=4 pq/L2 where p=population proportion to positive character, q=1-p and L= allowable error.), 95%confidence level and 90% power reference value.)
After the informed consent had been obtained eligible subjects provided the designed proforma. In the proforma questionnaire sought of information Name, Age, Sex, Dental visits, Oral hygiene Habit-Brushing aid and frequency, other habits, Income groups (National Council Of Applied Economical Research), Education were obtained.
Subjects were assured that their answers would be held strictly confidential to encourage complete and truthful self-reporting. In the clinical examination OHI-S index, Plaque Index, gingival Index was recorded to evaluate oral hygiene and gingival status of the subject. Plaque was recorded using an index developed by Silness and Loe 1964, Simplified Oral Hygiene Simplex index by Greene and Vermillion 1964.The full mouth gingival index (GI) of Loe and Silness 1963 was used to record gingival inflammation around the entire dentition (excluding 3rd molars)
The personality characters were assessed by using the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised Short-form (EPQR-S; Eysenck et al,1985).EPQR-S is self-reported questionnaire each question has a binary response- ‘yes’, ‘no’. For the complete understanding and better response, a questionnaire was provided in English-Hindi language. Each dichotomous item will be scored maximum ‘1’ and minimum ‘0’ possible score. EPQR-S includes 48 items and 4 subscales: Extroversion (E-12 items), Neuroticism (N-12 items), Psychotics P-912 items) and Lie (L-12 items). As an individual can have more than one personality trait, based on this models, the subjects who scored above average expressed greater forte of that particular factor and to be considered into that personality trait. Accordingly, subjects were divided into three groups: P, E, and N, respectively. For reliability of the answers given, a Lie scale was performed.
Those who scored more than the average score in lie scale were excluded from the study. Lie scales were originally introduced into personality measures in order to detect the ``faking good'' of scores on other scales (O'Donovan, 1969). According to Eysenck and Eysenck (1976) the lie scale included in the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire allows lying to be diagnosed when a set of rarely performed acts are permitted by the respondent as being habitually done and when frequently performed non-desirable acts are denied by the respondent. Extroversion (E) describes the personality as Sociable, Impulsive, Like excitements, Sensation seeking, Cheerful, Self-confident, Enthusiastic and Active person with high Extraversion are energetic, talkative, social, and dominant whereas, a person with low Extraversion tend to be soft, peaceful, reserved, and passive to other. Neuroticism (N) refers to the personality with Emotional instability, Impulsiveness or possessiveness, Excessive panic, anxiety, Low self-respect, overly sentiments, Feeling of guilt, Depression, Irritability, Tension, shyness. According to Eysenck's (1967) theory of personality, neuroticism is interlinked with low tolerance for stress or aversive stimuli. Those who score high in neuroticism are emotionally sensitive and susceptible to stress.
They are more likely to take ordinary situations as threatening and minor frustrations as miserably challenging and they are often in a bad mood. Psychoticism (P) personalities are non-conformist, tough-minded, willing to take risks, Unconcerned about the rights and welfare of others, may engage in antisocial behaviours and liking odd and unusual things. Statistical Analysis The data were analysed with the help of M.S. Excel and Epi-info software version 220.127.116.11. Chi-square test was applied and p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
620 subjects were given the questionnaire and explained to those who were not understood the questions. After lie scale, 40 subjects were excluded from the study. So the final sample size was 580 subjects. Due to multiple personalities in the subject; total 636 personality traits were calculated. In relation to 636 personality traits clinical and other parameter were statistically analyzed. 178 personalities of mean age 35.23 years were belonged to Psychoticism, among them117 male and 61 female. In Neuroticism total 229 personalities were involved of mean age 35.56years, 134 were male and 95 were female. 229 personalities, 134 male and 95 female of mean age 33.85years belonged to Extroversion. (As shown in table -1) Most of the personalities who had never visit the dental clinic were belong to extroversion and Neuroticism group.
Most of the personalities were brush their teeth once a day with toothbrush toothpaste. Most of The personalities had a habit of chewing tobacco. The personalities in group Extroversion and Neuroticism were from lower middle and middle-income groups. It was found that Simplified Oral Hygiene Index, Plaque Index Gingival Index was more in person with neuroticism type of personality.
Gingivitis is a non-destructive periodontal disease that causes irritation, redness and swelling of the gingival and if not controlled, it can progress to periodontitis, where the inflammation results in tissue destruction and alveolar bone resorption, which can ultimately lead to tooth morbidity.
The different personality instruments have been designed to examine, different personalities in individual and their differences in emotional and behavioural style. Personality tests/scales can be a useful tool to articulate the characteristic about personality in individual also it helps to describe the personality. Few scales are –Hardiness Scale, Courtauld Emotional control scale, Subjective scale of perceived social support, Multidimensional scale of perceived support (MSPSS), Life event scale etc.
Since the advance of Eysenck personality theory, various measures were developed in order to assess the various personality traits. The early Maudsley Medical Questionnaire(MMQ) contains 40 items (Eysenck ,1952), Mauddsley Personality Inventionary (MPI) contains 48 items(Eysenck ,1959),The Eysenck personality Inventionary (EPI) contains 57 items (Eysenck and Eysenck 1964),The Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQ) contains 90 items (Eysenck and Eysenck 1975)and the revised Eysenck Personality questionnaire (EPQR) contains 100 items (Eysenck, Eysenck and Barrett, 1985), Eysenck Personality Questionnaire Revised Short form (EPQRS) contains 48 items (Eysenck 1985). While determining different personality traits, even among all questionnaires were reliable and applicable; however, there is some practical disadvantages in using long tests. due to the length of sentence-based and some lexical measures, short forms of personality questionnaire have been developed and validated for use in applied research settings where questionnaire space and respondent time are limited such as EPQR-S (48 items). Now it been used widely. Trambek Tiwari et al 2009 suggested that EPQR-S is a reliable scale for the measurement of various personality traits.
However, some research suggested that because of its insufficient length it fails to provide adequate detail to evaluate personality. In the present study Plaque index, OHI-S index was used assess the oral hygiene performance and Gingival index were employed to assess the influence of personality traits on gingival health. Research into the association between personality and Oral health has shown at least three processes to be involved. First, the individual with dominant aggressive personality character shows poor oral health because of bruxism. Second, individuals who are low on constraint might be more likely to smoke it may predispose to poor oral health and ultimately leads to periodontitis. Third, highly stressful individual might tend to interpret oral symptoms as being more disastrous than would their low-scoring in stress character. Capsi A. et al 2005 indicated that individuals who score highly on Psychoticism scale are more aggressive which predisposes poor oral health as most of them having the habit of Bruxism. And subjects who score low in Extroversion are more likely to smoke which affects the periodontium leading to Periodontitis. Although it was long assumed that personality traits remain stable and unchanging, longitudinal research has documented that personality can and does change markedly, probably because of life experiences and lessons encountered in young adulthood.
In the present study it was observed that as there is certain association is present between personalities with oral hygiene and gingival health but no statistically significant difference exists amongst the traits (P, E,N) in relation to Simplified oral hygiene index, Gingival index, plaque index also with oral hygiene practice, other habits, dental visits, income groups, education .This finding is similar in relation gingival health to the Rajesh K.S.et al 2013 who Observed no statistically significant relation between personality traits and gingival health status of the subjects .However it was observed that use of tobacco was more and brushing frequency was less in certain personality.16 The study by Thomson et al 2011 aimed to describe the association between personality characteristics and self-reported oral health in a longstanding cohort study. It has found a consistent association between negative emotionality and poorer self- reported oral health, whether measured using a sophisticated scale or single-item global measures. Nikias et al. (1977) stated that when the Economic status was controlled for, lower educational level appeared, in their sample, to be related to poor oral hygiene, tooth loss, and periodontal disease. Paulandar et al 2003 concluded that Educational level was shown to influence the oral conditions and should be considered in assessing risk, and in planning appropriate preventive measures. As far the author knows this study is the first to observe the parameters such Education, Income, HI-S, Plaque index in association with different personalities. As it was seen that these factors could be a possible confounding factor in association with the study.
The findings of the present study suggested that there exist no co-relation between various personality traits and associated oral health status. However further trials should be conducted in future to validate the present findings.
Source: Meshram S, Gattani D, Shewale A, Bodele S (2017), Association of Personality Traits with Oral Health Status: A Cross-Sectional Study, International Journal of Indian Psychology, Volume 4, Issue 2, No. 95, ISSN:2348-5396 (e), ISSN:2349-3429 (p), DIP:18.01.167/20170402, ISBN:978-1-365-84231-3